The Great Depression of 2008?
So how do we avoid a repeat of the 1930s? It may not be possible to dodge it altogether but there is no reason it has to be that bad for that long. An economic depression is usually defined as a severe downturn that lasts several years. If you are retired and depending on your 401K the downturn is probably already severe. The market didn’t fully recover from the 1929 crash until 1954. That’s longer than most people can expect to be retired. If you live in Phoenix and your major asset is your house, that’s tanked too. If you’ve lost your job this is a tough time to be trying to find a new one. Those things alone will almost certainly translate to major losses for a lot of people and they will be permanent for some of us. Those of us who don’t have to sell anything to meet expenses any time soon should thank our lucky stars and think about living within our means for a while. We should also be paying close attention to what the government is doing. I would argue that the last depression was in large part caused and prolonged by bad government policy. If we have another one, we can look to the same source.
We’ve learned at least one lesson. The Federal Reserve is pumping money into the economy like crazy and they can be expected to continue doing that for as long as money is tight. Uncle Sam did the opposite eighty years ago with disastrous results. But two lessons we haven’t learned. We are clamoring for higher taxes on corporations and individuals, and for protectionist trade legislation. Both of those things are really awful ideas. We live in a global economy and trade is its life blood. These are tough economic times by anyone’s definition. If we are to get through them international trade will play a very large role. And Americans don’t need handouts so much as jobs, good jobs, and I don’t mean government jobs. We tried that in the 1930s too. So did Stalin. He kept at it, we backed off, and as they say the rest is history. We need those jobs in the private sector and that means private investment. The last thing we should be doing is discouraging investment with higher taxes on those most able to invest. One new lesson we ought to learn too. Our economy runs on energy, cheap, reliable, plentiful energy. It’s there, government really doesn’t have to do anything about it except get out of the way but we do need to stop this insane idea of deliberately driving up liquid fuel prices in order to discourage use of the internal combustion engine. Clean them up? Certainly, but we need those engines and the engines need fuel.
Here is what I propose. There are at least three free trade pacts gathering dust on congressional tables. Pass them. Get serious about the Doha Trade Talks. Renegotiate NAFTA? Yes. Expand it to include the rest of the


1 Comments:
I couldn’t agree with you more. This is a decidedly Republican stance however. Studies continue to show FDR’s public works policies only served to EXTEND the depression rather than truncate it. Higher taxes serve to stifle economic progress as does protectionism in the form of unions. What is the result of a union guy at GM making $100K a year screwing in bolts – crappy cars that can’t compete. GM has been crippled by the unions it has supported for 40 years. Americans need the ability to be entrepreneurs, to be creative and productive. Remember, Microsoft was started in a garage. In America only is this possible.
So what’s wrong with America? A stock market bubble, followed by a housing bubble compounded by high commodity (notably oil) prices. Oh and then there is Iraq which I’m not going to get into.
The republicans can not be blamed for the so called “failed economic policies of the last 8 years.” It’s a great sound bite but is not based in reality. We had a stock market bubble fueled by a lack of policy response from the Fed during the Clinton years. I don’t blame Clinton I am just pointing out that it can happen on anyone’s watch. The president trusts the fed chairman and his expertise and is not in the business of influencing fed policy – Greenspan has only recently admitted in testimony to Congress that his model failed him. This was followed by a lack of Fed response to a housing bubble fueled by excessive interest rates cuts combined with a complete lack of regulation in lending and exacerbated by rating agencies in bed with the issuers of their mortgage backed securities (i.e. Standard and Poors gave subprime mortgage backed securities their top ratings in exchange for high fees.) Even speaker Pelosi will agree that Busch has been jumping up and down about this for years – but ending the housing frenzy wasn’t going to get anyone re-elected and that is what prevented any end to the party. Everyone knew banks were engaging in irresponsible lending (the California family making $60K a year qualifying for a $500K home), consumers were taking on irresponsible loans based on the belief that home prices would go up 20% every year (ARMs, interest only loans, Home equity lines) and banks were happily unloading these loans as investment grade thanks to the S&P to municipalities, pension funds, publically traded companies – everyone got hurt.
And I find it all too coincidental that the EXACT day the commodities regulators reclassified several foreign commodity traders from commercial to speculative marks the peak in oil prices. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission found (CFTC is the commodity exchanges equivalent to the SEC) that the Swiss energy firm Vitol had secured 11 percent of the oil contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The CFTC data infers that financial firms comprised more than 80 percent of the oil contracts on that exchange. Check out Vitol – funny how we run into the pardoned Marc Rich again!
Yes things ran off the rails but EVERYONE (everyone) was on board: the CFTC, the Fed but at the end of the day I think the one of the greatest impacts came from the Ratings Agencies. Without their total compliance you couldn’t sell junk MBS as investment grade MBS. And that precisely is what is costing $700B.
Post a Comment
<< Home